1/3/2018 0 Comments Speakerphone Vst TorrentAudio Ease has released Windows version 6.3.4 of reverb effect Altiverb, and Mac version 2.0.2 of Speakerphone, an authentic speaker simulation effect plug-in. Changes in Altiverb v6.3.4 • [VST] Altiverb 6.3.3 was only mono-stereo in Sonar, this update fixes this – Altiverb 6.3.4 is stereo again in Sonar. Changes in Speakerphone v2.0.2 • [VST] Better parameter names in automation. • [all] Compatibility with Speakerphone 1 has improved. • [installer] Fixed an installer folder privilege problem. • [AU] Fixed crash in Digital Performer Auval. The Speakerphone v2.0.2 Windows update will follow later this summer. Download AudioEase Speakerphone AU RTAS VST MAS v2.0.2 OSX INTEL torrent or any other torrent from Mac category. Download AudioEase.Speakerphone.VST Torrent - Kickass Torrents Download AudioEase.Speakerphone.VST torrent or any other torrent from Windows category. More information. Henchman, I love your enthusiasm for mastering the basic building blocks in audio post, but to my ears Speakerphone really does treat sounds in ways that can't be quickly duplicated with those tools. Often Speakerphone perfectly nails the exact combination of resonance and amplitude-dependent distortion that is exhibited by common devices in the real-world. Could you make an 80s-era Casiotone keyboard speaker with basic tools? Yes, but it would take a long time, and Speakerphone lets you dial it in in just a couple of minutes. To the original OP, I haven't tried Speakerphone's competition, so I can't tell you what is or isn't better, but I'm a happy owner of SP.I just can't bring myself to spend $500 on a plug-in that does something I can already do with existing plugins. I do find it funny to see people jumping on plugins like speakerphone, that you use maybe 5% in a mix. But then hum and haw about spending $500 an a really good unwrap plugin, that you'll use, in the case of a lot of shows 50-80% in your mix. I just can't bring myself to spend $500 on a plug-in that does something I can already do with existing plugins. I do find it funny to see people jumping on plugins like speakerphone, that you use maybe 5% in a mix. But then hum and haw about spending $500 an a really good unwrap plugin, that you'll use, in the case of a lot of shows 50-80% in your mix.For mixing I generally do standard futzes the same way you do Mark, although I have used Futzbox for mixing on occasion, not often, but it was very useful a few times. I think it's only $149, so it's relatively cheap. I agree that Speakerphone is way overpriced if you are just using it for standard futzing, plus it's almost useless on a dub stage except for milking overtime, which is never a good idea. However, for certain sound design purposes it can be brilliant and does things that no other plugin can, but that is stuff that should be done in the editing room, not on a dub stage. For mixing I generally do standard futzes the same way you do Mark, although I have used Futzbox for mixing on occasion, not often, but it was very useful a few times. I think it's only $149, so it's relatively cheap. I agree that Speakerphone is way overpriced if you are just using it for standard futzing, plus it's almost useless on a dub stage except for milking overtime, which is never a good idea. However, for certain sound design purposes it can be brilliant and does things that no other plugin can, but that is stuff that should be done in the editing room, not on a dub stage.Agreed. Why do you think so? I find it very easy and quick to use.Aside from automation and stability issues, I just don't find the speaker simlations and presets particularly useful as-is, so I wind up having to spend too much time tweaking the settings, which are very small and aren't laid out well, IMO. If I need to EQ or compress the futz I get much better results with my regular EQ or compressor. It's a whole lot faster to just do what Mark does - it works extremely well and is easy to adapt to the needs of the moment. Like I said, I use Speakerphone often as an audiosuite plugin for sound design, and it can do amazing and wierd things, but it's way over-kill for standard futz needs and it's never quick and easy to get to what I want. I've used both Speakerphone and Fuzzbox extensively and have found the following. When I was mixing 'Unfriended' literally all of the dialog had to be futz'd because it was a horror film taking place entirely though Skype connections. I started with speakerphone as my futz machine and it was a huge PITA. The plugin sounds excellent but the automation bugs are enough to drive a man crazy. I brought in Futzbox because the automation is MUCH more stable, but the device convolutions are not as pleasing and you can't dial things in quite as well. The added convolutions in speakerphone for verb and covers were excellent for ADR matching and futzing all in one place. The gate in Futzbox made it really easy to create the breaking connection sounds and was easily automatable. Over all I think Speakerphone makes a nice set and forget plugin for creating a specific 'Tone' and Futzbox can be a much more reliable tool to be able to tweak and modify the sound when needed. I think Speakerphone creates a way more Modern Phone Filter than what you can do with the Henchman method. The GSM tuning and glitches and static, etc - you don't get that with Comp n EQ. My problem is my Clients won't accept it. They have the classic Henchman sound in their head. And, as always, give em what they want.Yup, most times I use speakerphone, I tweak away until it sounds just like the real thing only to have my client think it sounds 'wrong'. I've now gone back to the old school and clients never complain. It never hurts me to give the client what they want.Simply put, yes. Always at the end. But, communication and earned trust is key. At times, you have to explain, simplify and translate your intention to their understanding; [did Bobby finally get his wheat toast? >> 'Five Easy Pieces'] That said, I do use Speaker Phone a lot and I like it. Saves them time. Once the show is on air (I do TV only) most people can't tell if that BG was processed with SP or via a chain of other plugins. Just my opinion. Rules: • Illegal torrents are not allowed - all torrents must be legal • Be nice. • Include a description of what the torrent is or include a link to a page which describes the torrent. • No racism, sexism, or bigotry allowed. Saying your preferences, like 'I like software X better' is ok. Do I really need to explain this? Also, be sure to properly flair your posts: • Posts that lead to torrents: flair Download • Posts requesting a specific item: flair Request • Once your request has been fulfilled: update flair to Resolved • Posts about the sub itself or asking for help: flair Meta Links: Our Telegram is @reddittorrentlinks • • • • • • • • (shameless plug) • (shameless plug) • (not specific to torrentlinks).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |